New: WebsiteBench. Can AI agents rebuild websites through browser exploration?WebsiteBench Star on GitHubStar
Research paper

MCP vs RAG vs NLWeb vs HTML: A Comparison of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Different Agent Interfaces to the Web (Technical Report)

Compares HTML browsing, RAG, MCP, and NLWeb interfaces for web agents performing product search, comparison, and checkout tasks in four simulated e-shops.

AI-assisted editorial review against a primary source. This is a catalog annotation, not an independent reproduction or endorsement.

Original source ↗Read as MarkdownRecord JSON

What is this resource?

Resource type
Research paper
Environment
Web
Topics
Evaluation, Tool integration, Efficiency, Web navigation
Record publication date
2025-11-28
Evidence retrieved
2026-11-05
Resource ID
arxiv:2511.23281

Recorded paper version

arXiv v1

Version updated: 2025-11-28T15:32:15Z.

This identifies the retained arXiv metadata snapshot; newly observed changes require separate review.

Abstract fingerprint324dc1d610b3eef0712522ac69dbf799028199d30801bebf8b89870ee2b31989

Authors

Aaron Steiner, Ralph Peeters, Christian Bizer

Cite this paper

Download BibTeX · Download CSL JSON

Citations preserve the selected source edition, its authors and recorded date precision. Unrecorded venues and identifiers are omitted.

Explore related topics

EvaluationTool integrationEfficiencyWeb navigation

Scope and limitations

The annotation and scope were reviewed against the complete retained arXiv abstract (v1). The comparison uses four simulated e-shops. Experiments, reported performance and artifact availability have not been independently reproduced.

Primary evidence and verification

Source retrieval is separate from experiment reproduction. Use the original publication or publisher page when citing claims about the resource.

  1. arxiv api

    Retrieved 2026-11-05T21:14:07Z. Supports: name, authors, published_at, updated_at, identifiers.arxiv, details.arxiv_snapshot.

    Content fingerprint410a4c48b9605a531d3e6008c561ce3e3e9d92609168f5d49fadc04f5f943289
  2. editorial primary review

    Retrieved 2026-11-05T23:02:12Z. Supports: name, kind, summary, environments, topics, scope, relations.

    Content fingerprint20bdf96426e8120a0cbfdbebadfabbbd4cda26d2d35ab670885f58b35ea35d5d

Suggest a correction

Open a source-backed correction. Include this record ID and the original source. Read our editorial policy and coverage boundaries.

Useful? Star Awesome CUA on GitHub